Get all the data you need about the real estate market in Jerusalem
SUMMARY
Yes, we would generally avoid church land in Jerusalem when the apartment depends on one of the unresolved leases expiring around 2050–2052, unless the property is deeply discounted or already has a credible path to secure long-term rights.
The key issue is no longer that the lease expires someday in the distant future. Roughly 25 years remaining is already short enough to affect the buyer who purchases today, the bank financing the purchase, and especially the person expected to buy the apartment ten years from now.
The underlying land has also moved from church ownership into private commercial hands. Extell's acquisition creates a plausible route toward redevelopment and lease extensions, but it also means buyers should stop assuming that the status quo will simply continue indefinitely on inexpensive terms.
The strongest market evidence suggests that buyers begin discounting insecure property rights decades before expiry. Jerusalem properties with 11–40 years remaining on their leases showed discounts of roughly 30% in the Givati-Rigbi transaction study, while insecure properties were also materially less likely to sell.
That makes a 30% discount much less exciting than it first appears. On one of the problematic leases, a property selling 30% below an equivalent secure apartment may simply be correctly priced for the risk rather than mispriced in the buyer's favor.
Mortgageability may be even more important than today's sale price. Even a cash buyer inherits the risk that the next buyer will need a mortgage, and a shrinking pool of bank-financed buyers can turn a perfectly usable apartment into a difficult asset to exit.
Church land is not one single legal category. Two apartments in the same Jerusalem neighborhood can have completely different risk depending on the landowner, head lease, sublease, expiry date, extension mechanism and whether stronger ownership rights have already been secured.
There is real upside if the dispute is resolved. Extell has discussed 99-year extensions, a formula reportedly based on 5.5% of land value and urban-renewal arrangements that could eventually give some residents new apartments with much stronger rights.
Rental economics can also look surprisingly good because tenants care much less about a lease expiring decades from now than buyers do. A discounted church-land apartment may therefore produce a better headline rental yield than a similar freehold apartment, although that advantage can disappear if the exit value deteriorates further.
The holding period changes the decision sharply. A buyer who expects to resell in ten years may be handing the next purchaser a property with only around 15 years left on the underlying lease, so the investment can become riskier even if absolutely nothing goes wrong during ownership.
The practical rule is simple: price the apartment using the rights that exist today, not the settlement everyone hopes will eventually happen. Any favorable extension, redevelopment agreement or conversion into stronger ownership should be treated as upside until it is binding.
Thinking of buying real estate in Jerusalem?
Acquiring property in a different country is a complex task. Don't fall into common traps – grab our guide and make better decisions.
Why are Jerusalem buyers so worried about church land right now?
Church land in Jerusalem has become a real problem for buyers because several important leases in Talbiya, Rehavia and Nayot are now close enough to expiry to affect mortgages, resale prices and decisions people are making today.
The best-known case covers roughly 500-plus dunams originally owned by the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate and leased to KKL-JNF in the early 1950s. Around 1,100 apartments are affected by leases expected to end around 2050–2052, alongside hotels, public institutions and other properties.
Twenty-five years may sound like plenty of time. In real estate, it really is not. Someone buying a home now could still own it when the main lease expires, while someone buying that apartment from them in ten years would face only around 15 years of remaining tenure.
There has also been a major change in who owns the land. The church sold the underlying ownership to private investors, and Extell, controlled by New York developer Gary Barnett, later acquired the portfolio for roughly NIS 750 million. Extell wants to unlock development and urban-renewal value across the sites.
The uncertainty is already affecting the market. A study by Hebrew University researchers Yehonatan Givati and Oren Rigbi, based on Jerusalem transactions between 2004 and 2024, found lower prices and fewer transactions for apartments with insecure rights. More recently, the Jerusalem Land Lessees Forum claimed that some affected apartment values had fallen by around 50% and that mortgage lending had largely dried up. That 50% figure comes from the residents' organization, so we should not treat it as a measured market-wide decline, but the financing problem itself has become difficult to dismiss.
| Issue | What has changed | Situation currently | Why buyers care |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main leases | Once felt very distant | Major leases end around 2050–2052 | Now inside a normal ownership horizon |
| Landowner | Historically a church institution | Major portfolio is privately owned by Extell | Commercial development incentives matter |
| Resale | Location once dominated the discussion | Land status increasingly affects demand | Exit can become harder before expiry |
| Financing | Future concern | Residents report serious mortgage difficulties | Fewer buyers can finance purchases |
| Resolution | Frequently assumed something would eventually happen | Negotiations continue without a final universal agreement | Buyers still carry the uncertainty |
Do you actually own a Jerusalem apartment built on church land?
You can legally own valuable rights in a Jerusalem church-land apartment, but those rights may depend on a lease that ends long before the building itself does.
That distinction explains much of the confusion.
Long leases are common in Israel. Millions of Israelis hold property through long-term arrangements involving public land, and that structure by itself is not alarming. The problem becomes much more serious when the continuation of the apartment owner's rights depends on a head lease whose future cost and terms remain unresolved.
In the major Greek Orthodox land portfolio, KKL leased the land and residents later received sublease rights. The apartment may therefore be registered and completely legitimate while the underlying land remains owned by someone else.
For a buyer, the critical information is the exact right being purchased, its expiry date and what the contract says happens afterward.
A broker saying that an apartment is “registered” tells us very little about those three points.
Don't buy the wrong property, in the wrong area of Jerusalem
Buying real estate is a significant investment. Don't rely solely on your intuition. Gather the right information to make the best decision.
Are all church-land apartments in Jerusalem risky?
No. Some Jerusalem church-land apartments carry manageable tenure risk, while others deserve a very large discount or should simply be avoided.
“Church land” covers different churches, different contracts, different lease dates and different ownership histories. Even within Talbiya or Rehavia, two apartments a few hundred meters apart can have completely different legal profiles.
Some leases run much longer. Some include clearer renewal mechanisms. Some rights may already have been converted or reorganized. Others remain tied directly to the disputed KKL leases ending around 2050–2052.
That makes the block, parcel and lease more important than the neighborhood name.
We would therefore never price an apartment simply by comparing “church-land Talbiya” with “normal Talbiya.” We first need to know whether both properties actually carry the same problem.
| Property structure | Current risk | What needs checking | How we would treat it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full private ownership | Low tenure risk | Normal title issues | Compare normally |
| Long lease with clear renewal terms | Usually manageable | Renewal mechanism and cost | Often acceptable |
| Lease approaching expiry with defined extension | Moderate | Exact extension cost | Price the cost explicitly |
| KKL sublease tied to unresolved 2050–2052 lease | High | Renewal, financing and settlement | Require a large discount |
| Direct church lease with unclear end terms | High | Contract wording and expiry consequences | Analyze individually |
| Rights already converted into secure ownership | Much lower | Confirm registration | Can trade much more like normal property |
How much cheaper are church-land apartments in Jerusalem?
Church-land apartments with uncertain rights have sold about 10%–15% below comparable secure Jerusalem apartments on average, with discounts around 30% once the remaining lease becomes short enough to worry buyers.
That comes from the Givati-Rigbi study of residential transactions from 2004 through 2024. The researchers compared insecure properties with nearby secure properties while controlling for location, property characteristics and transaction timing.
The most useful finding is the way the discount changes as expiry approaches.
With more than roughly 51 years left, the measured gap was only around 3% in the strongest specification. With 41–51 years remaining, it was around 10%. For properties with 11–40 years remaining, the discount reached roughly 30%.
That pattern tells us far more than the average 10%–15% figure. Buyers start reacting decades before the legal right actually ends.
Today, the most closely watched Talbiya, Rehavia and Nayot leases sit squarely inside that danger zone.
Resident representatives have lately claimed losses of around 50% on some homes. We would be careful with that number because it has not been established through the same transaction-level methodology as the academic study. Still, it suggests that conditions on the hardest-to-finance properties may now be worse than the 2004–2024 average.
| Remaining lease term in study | Approximate measured price gap | What it suggests |
|---|---|---|
| More than 51 years | ~3% | Buyers barely price distant expiry |
| 41–51 years | ~10% | Tenure starts affecting value |
| 11–40 years | ~30% | Expiry becomes a major pricing issue |
| All insecure properties combined | ~10%–15% | Persistent average penalty |
Get to know the market before buying a property in Jerusalem
Better information leads to better decisions. Get all the data you need before investing a large amount of money.
Are church-land apartments becoming harder to sell?
Yes. Jerusalem church-land apartments are currently suffering from a liquidity problem as well as a price problem.
The Hebrew University research found that properties with insecure rights were roughly 20% less likely to transact than comparable secure properties.
Globes separately reported that demand for the affected properties had fallen by about 20% over four years.
Those numbers suggest that some potential buyers are walking away entirely instead of simply asking for a lower price.
The effect can become stronger as the lease shortens. Banks become more cautious, financed buyers disappear, cash buyers gain bargaining power and owners trying to sell face a narrower market.
Recent comments from the Jerusalem Land Lessees Forum go further, describing some apartments as almost impossible to sell or finance. Again, that is the residents' account rather than an independently measured market statistic. But it fits the direction already visible in transaction data.
For an investor, this is one of the hardest risks to ignore. An apartment can remain perfectly habitable and still become much harder to exit.
Can you still get a mortgage on Jerusalem church land?
Mortgage financing on the most problematic Jerusalem church-land apartments is currently difficult enough that we would never sign a purchase contract before getting approval for the exact property.
There is no blanket Israeli rule banning mortgages on leased land. Banks regularly lend against leasehold property.
Their problem is the collateral.
A lender providing a 20- or 30-year mortgage wants to know that the property right will remain valuable throughout the loan. A lease ending around 2051 creates an obvious problem when a new mortgage could run almost until the same date.
The Jerusalem Land Lessees Forum recently told KKL that banks had stopped granting mortgages on affected apartments. We would read that as evidence of serious lending friction, rather than proof that every Israeli bank rejects every parcel.
The distinction does not make the issue harmless. Even a cash buyer needs to care about future bankability because the next owner may need financing.
That can cut the resale pool dramatically.
Buying real estate in Jerusalem can be risky
An increasing number of foreign investors are showing interest. However, 90% of them will make mistakes. Avoid the pitfalls with our comprehensive guide.
Could a heavily discounted church-land apartment be a bargain?
Yes. A Jerusalem church-land apartment can be a very good purchase when the discount is clearly larger than the legal and resale risk we are taking.
Suppose two genuinely comparable Talbiya apartments would normally be worth NIS 6 million with secure rights. One church-land unit sells for NIS 4.2 million.
That is a 30% discount, or NIS 1.8 million.
At first glance, the cheaper apartment looks extraordinary. The problem is that the historical transaction evidence already shows roughly 30% discounts for insecure properties in the 11–40-year remaining-lease range.
A 30% discount therefore may simply be the normal market price of the problem.
The opportunity becomes more interesting if the apartment is 40% or 45% cheaper despite having the same legal profile, or if we discover that its particular lease offers stronger renewal rights than the market assumes.
A clearly affordable route to securing another 99 years could also change the calculation dramatically.
What we would avoid is a deal that only works if the lease dispute gets solved favorably. The purchase should already make financial sense under a conservative scenario, with a future settlement providing upside.
What does the market think will happen when the Jerusalem church leases expire?
Jerusalem prices suggest buyers currently see a serious chance of losing value at lease expiry, but they clearly do not behave as though residents are certain to lose everything.
Givati and Rigbi went beyond measuring discounts. They compared observed market prices with the theoretical value of a lease that would definitely leave the holder with nothing when the term ended.
Their model suggests market participants were effectively pricing a substantial probability of an adverse outcome, roughly in the 30%–50% range depending on the assumptions.
That needs a bit of care.
It does not mean an apartment owner literally has a 30%–50% chance of being evicted. The number is an implied probability extracted from asset prices under an economic model.
Still, it tells us something useful about how buyers view the dispute. A painless extension is not being priced as guaranteed, while total loss is not being priced as inevitable either.
That uncertainty explains why the market can produce enormous discounts without collapsing completely.
Don't lose money on your property in Jerusalem
100% of people who have lost money there have spent less than 1 hour researching the market. We have reviewed everything there is to know. Grab our guide now.
Doesn't KKL already have the right to extend the church leases?
KKL appears to have important extension rights, but buyers still cannot assume those rights will produce a cheap and automatic extension for every apartment.
This question sits at the center of the current dispute.
The historic KKL leases contain renewal provisions, and reporting on the agreements describes options for additional periods of roughly 50 or 100 years in different contracts. The price can depend on a valuation or third-party determination.
A group of residents has taken a much stronger position, arguing that KKL's rights amount to an effectively automatic and continuing extension on very favorable terms. Their court petition accused KKL of being prepared to surrender valuable contractual rights in negotiations with Extell.
Extell and KKL dispute that interpretation.
For someone buying an apartment, that disagreement is already part of the risk. A theoretical contractual right is much less comforting if years of litigation or negotiation are still required to establish what it costs and how residents benefit from it.
We would price the property using rights that can actually be enforced today, then treat a better interpretation of the extension clause as potential upside.
Didn't the Supreme Court already settle the Jerusalem church-land case?
No. The Supreme Court recently ended the long-running dispute over a failed lease-extension deal from around 2000, while the current 2050–2052 problem for residents remains unresolved.
This distinction is easy to miss because the old lawsuit also involved the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate, KKL and lease extensions.
Around the turn of the century, an attempt was made to arrange a very long extension of the church leases. The transaction collapsed amid allegations of fraud and became the subject of years of litigation.
The Supreme Court ultimately determined that the relevant interim document did not constitute a binding real-estate agreement. A later request for another hearing was rejected, finally closing that particular case.
None of that gives today's apartment owners a fresh 99-year lease.
The underlying leases approaching 2050–2052 still need a workable solution.
For buyers, the recent court decision removes one old legal avenue without removing the central uncertainty hanging over the apartments.
Get the full checklist for your due diligence in Jerusalem
Don't repeat the same mistakes others have made before you. Make sure everything is in order before signing your sales contract.
Is Extell actually offering Jerusalem residents a way out?
Yes. Extell has put real solutions on the table, including long lease extensions and urban renewal, although no universal agreement currently protects every affected apartment owner.
One important proposal reported during negotiations with KKL would allow residents to extend their leases for 99 years in exchange for 5.5% of the land value.
That structure would turn a vague future liability into something much easier to value.
Extell has also promoted redevelopment. In court filings reported in 2025, the company said more than 120 apartment owners had already signed letters of intent for urban-renewal projects and that hundreds more were in discussions.
For qualifying owner-occupiers, Extell described a route under which residents could receive a newly built apartment under full ownership as part of redevelopment. The exact treatment varies according to the owner's circumstances and the deal ultimately signed.
This looked like meaningful progress.
The latest picture is less clean. Resident representatives said in 2026 that negotiations had slowed after a change in KKL leadership and pushed KKL to accelerate a settlement. KKL responded that major decisions were expected soon.
So there are credible routes toward resolution, but no reason to price an unsigned proposal as if the uncertainty has disappeared.
| Proposed route | Potential benefit | Current limitation | How we would value it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 99-year lease extension | Removes near-term expiry risk | Final terms still need agreement | Valuable once binding |
| Payment based on 5.5% of land value | Makes cost more quantifiable | Land valuation still matters | Model it, do not assume it |
| Urban renewal | Could deliver new apartment with stronger rights | Planning and owner consent take time | Real optionality |
| Full ownership through redevelopment | Could remove tenure discount entirely | Not available automatically to everyone | Major upside where contractually secured |
| Wider KKL-Extell settlement | Could resolve many properties together | Negotiations remain unfinished | Do not prepay for it |
Could urban renewal rescue the value of these church-land apartments?
Yes. Urban renewal could unlock a lot of value on some Jerusalem church-land sites because the same legal problem depressing prices has also prevented old buildings from being redeveloped normally.
Many affected buildings in Talbiya, Rehavia and Nayot are decades old. Some lack elevators, parking, modern seismic protection or protected rooms.
Those characteristics would normally make redevelopment attractive.
The difficult land structure gets in the way because a developer cannot comfortably finance a major new project without knowing who controls the property for the long term.
Extell has a strong reason to solve that problem. It owns the land and wants to develop both existing and undeveloped sites. Residents want secure tenure and better apartments.
More than 120 owners had already signed preliminary urban-renewal agreements according to Extell's court filing, which is enough to show that the idea has moved beyond a presentation.
We still would not pay for a future redevelopment as though it were guaranteed. Planning approval, building economics, resident consent, taxation and the treatment of different owner categories can all change the result.
But among the bullish arguments for selected church-land properties, this is one of the strongest.
Don't sign a document you don't understand in Jerusalem
Buying a property over there? We have reviewed all the documents you need to know. Stay out of trouble - grab our comprehensive guide.
Is church land especially risky if you want to resell in ten years?
Yes. Buying a Jerusalem church-land apartment with a ten-year exit plan can be particularly risky because the next buyer will face a much shorter remaining lease than you do today.
Take an apartment tied to a lease ending around 2051.
A buyer purchasing now sees roughly 25 years remaining. Sell around ten years later and the next buyer sees only about 15.
Nothing needs to go legally wrong during those ten years for the value gap to widen.
The historical data already show the market applying larger discounts as remaining lease duration falls. Financing can also become harder as a new mortgage term begins to approach the lease-expiry date.
This makes the holding period unusually important.
Someone planning to live in the apartment for decades and who accepts the uncertainty can view the property very differently from an investor who expects to sell on schedule.
For a ten-year investment, we would assume the future buyer will be more cautious than today's buyer unless a binding settlement is reached before then.
Does renting out a church-land apartment make the risk easier to accept?
Yes, to a point. A discounted Jerusalem church-land apartment can produce an attractive rental yield because tenants care far less about a lease ending decades from now than buyers do.
A tenant choosing between two Talbiya apartments mainly sees location, size, renovation, light and monthly rent.
The land tenure can have a much smaller effect on rent than on the sale price.
If a normal apartment worth NIS 6 million and a church-land apartment worth NIS 4.2 million can command similar rent, the cheaper property naturally shows a much higher gross yield.
That is a real advantage for cash investors.
The trap comes at resale. Extra rental yield earned for ten years can be overwhelmed by another large repricing if the remaining lease falls from 25 years to 15 and the dispute still has not been settled.
We would therefore calculate returns using both cash flow and a conservative exit value. Looking only at the gross yield makes these apartments appear safer than they really are.
Get fresh and reliable information about the market in Jerusalem
Don't base significant investment decisions on outdated data. Get updated and accurate information.
How big a discount would make Jerusalem church land worth buying?
For the unresolved 2050–2052 leases, a 5% or 10% discount is nowhere near enough; around 30% starts to resemble the historical market price of the risk rather than an obvious bargain.
The Givati-Rigbi research gives us the best empirical reference point available. Properties in the 11–40-year remaining-lease range showed discounts around 30% in their analysis.
So if a normal comparable apartment is worth NIS 6 million, paying NIS 5.5 million for the risky one would make little sense to us. Even NIS 4.2 million, exactly 30% lower, may simply compensate for normal tenure uncertainty.
We would become more interested when the price falls materially beyond the discount justified by the specific lease, or when legal due diligence reveals that the property is safer than other buyers think.
The comparison must also be extremely local. Same street if possible, similar building age, floor, size, condition, elevator, parking and view. A cheap old apartment on leased land cannot be compared with a renovated privately owned penthouse and called “40% discounted.”
Foreign buyers should be particularly strict here. Cash makes it easier to purchase a property that local mortgage buyers cannot finance, which can create opportunity, but it can also hide the reason the apartment is cheap.
Before buying, we would want a Jerusalem property lawyer to reconstruct the head lease, sublease, expiry date, extension provisions and registered rights. We would also ask at least one bank whether it would lend against that exact block and parcel, even if we personally intend to pay cash.
The bank's answer tells us something important about the next buyer.
Should you avoid church land in Jerusalem?
For a normal homebuyer, we would currently avoid the unresolved Jerusalem church-land leases approaching 2050–2052 unless the price is deeply discounted or the apartment already has a clear path to secure long-term rights.
The evidence has become too strong to dismiss the problem as legal fine print.
The Hebrew University study found 10%–15% average price penalties, discounts around 30% for shorter remaining leases and roughly 20% lower transaction likelihood. More recent resident claims describe even steeper losses and severe mortgage problems. As discussed above, that latest 50% estimate comes from the leaseholders themselves and should be treated cautiously, but it points in the same direction as the measured data.
There are also credible reasons the final outcome could be much better than today's prices imply. KKL has extension provisions in its historic agreements. Extell has proposed long extensions and redevelopment structures. More than 120 residents had already entered preliminary urban-renewal arrangements, and both the landowner and residents have strong financial reasons to reach a deal.
None of those possibilities gives us a reason to pay close to a normal freehold price today.
Someone looking for a straightforward family home, ordinary mortgage financing and easy resale can find cleaner ownership elsewhere in Jerusalem. Taking this extra risk to save 5% or 10% makes little sense.
A sophisticated cash buyer can reach a different conclusion. If the apartment is 30%, 40% or more below a truly comparable secure property, the lease has been reviewed properly, and the investment still works without assuming a favorable settlement, the risk may be worth taking.
So we would not automatically reject every Jerusalem apartment carrying some historical connection to church land. But for the unresolved leases ending around 2050–2052, avoidance should be the default and the burden of proof should sit with the deal.
The apartment needs to be unusually cheap, unusually well protected, or preferably both.
Get to know the market before buying a property in Jerusalem
Better information leads to better decisions. Get all the data you need before investing a large amount of money.
OUR METHODOLOGY
This analysis tests whether the unresolved church-land structure in Jerusalem changes the risk and reward enough to alter a buyer's decision. We examine the legal structure of the rights, remaining lease duration, observed pricing and transaction behavior, mortgageability, resale liquidity, holding period, extension provisions and the settlement or redevelopment paths currently being discussed.
We did not treat “church land” as one homogeneous category. Different churches, head leases, subleases, expiry dates, renewal mechanisms and ownership histories can produce very different risks, so the block, parcel and actual contract matter more than the neighborhood label.
For the underlying legal structure, we gave particular weight to the original Greek Orthodox Patriarchate–KKL lease documentation and official Israeli sources explaining ownership, leasehold, sublease and Land Registry records. The individual apartment still needs property-specific legal review because a registered apartment does not automatically mean ownership of the underlying land.
The main empirical anchor is Yehonatan Givati and Oren Rigbi's study, “The Economic Consequences of Insecure Property Rights,” which analyzes Jerusalem residential transactions from 2004 through 2024. We use it for the measured relationship between insecure rights, apartment prices, transaction probability and the number of years remaining on the lease.
We kept measured transaction evidence separate from current resident claims. The roughly 10%–15% average price penalty, larger discounts as expiry approaches and lower transaction probability come from transaction-level research, while the more recent claims of roughly 50% value declines and severe mortgage difficulties come from the Jerusalem Land Lessees Forum and are identified as such in the analysis.
Recent Israeli reporting is used to extend the picture beyond the academic dataset. Calcalist and Globes provide reporting on the roughly NIS 750 million acquisition of the land portfolio, current market difficulties, the KKL-Extell negotiations, the proposed 99-year extension structure, court proceedings and the urban-renewal arrangements being discussed with residents.
We treat Extell's proposals as genuine potential solutions, not as secured outcomes. Reported proposals involving a 99-year extension for 5.5% of land value, redevelopment and stronger ownership rights can materially improve the economics, but they are not included in today's property value as though every affected owner already has a binding agreement.
We also distinguish the recent Supreme Court developments from the underlying 2050–2052 lease problem. Reporting on the long-running dispute over the failed transaction from around 2000 helps explain what the court actually resolved, while separate reporting and the historic lease documents are used for the extension rights still being debated today.
When discussing whether a church-land apartment is cheap, we compare it conceptually with a genuinely comparable secure apartment rather than with a neighborhood average. Location, building age, floor, size, condition, elevator, parking, view and the precise legal structure all need to be as similar as possible before a percentage discount means very much.
Key sources used for this analysis include: the original Greek Orthodox Patriarchate–KKL lease agreement, Givati and Rigbi's transaction-level study, Globes on demand and the affected apartment portfolio, Calcalist on Extell's acquisition of the church-land portfolio, Calcalist on the proposed 99-year extensions and 5.5% payment structure, Calcalist on the urban-renewal process and more than 120 participating owners, Calcalist's August 2026 reporting on resident claims of falling values and mortgage difficulties, Calcalist on the leaseholders' court petition concerning KKL's extension rights, Calcalist on the Supreme Court proceedings involving KKL-Extell negotiations, Calcalist on the separate long-running Patriarchate-Himanuta dispute, Ynet on the historic leases and extension mechanisms, The Times of Israel on the sale of church lands to private investors, Extell Israel's own communications, the Ministry of Justice Land Registry extract service, the Israeli government's property-rights classifications, and Israel Land Authority guidance on ordinary lease renewal.
Buying real estate in Jerusalem can be risky
An increasing number of foreign investors are showing interest. However, 90% of them will make mistakes. Avoid the pitfalls with our comprehensive guide.
Related blog posts
- What should you watch out for when buying property in Jerusalem?
- How expensive are homes in Jerusalem now?
- Should I buy an apartment without a mamad?
- Is Talbiya too expensive to buy now?
