Get all the data you need about the real estate market in Israel
SUMMARY
If you can’t make your final Israel apartment payment, you are in breach and the purchase can ultimately be cancelled, but a missed deadline does not automatically mean the apartment is lost.
The reason this problem is showing up more often now is structural. Developers spent several years selling apartments with 10/90, 15/85, 20/80 and similar payment schedules, so a large part of the buyer’s financing risk was pushed all the way to handover.
The Bank of Israel’s 2025 banking review shows the effect clearly: housing credit still grew 7.4% while housing transactions fell, partly because buyers were taking mortgages much later than they signed the purchase contracts. That gap is where a deal that looked affordable two or three years ago can suddenly fail.
The legal risk depends heavily on the contract. Israeli law distinguishes between an ordinary breach and a fundamental breach, while apartment agreements often give special weight to the final payment due against possession. There is no universal seven-, ten- or thirty-day grace period.
A short delay and a real inability to pay are not the same problem. A mortgage arriving eight days late may be fixable through a contractual cure period or a written extension; a buyer who simply cannot produce the balance is much closer to cancellation territory.
Even a fundamental breach does not make cancellation automatic in every case. In the 2026 Jacobs v. Amar decision, the Supreme Court treated the buyers’ non-payment as fundamental but still held that immediate cancellation was not permissible on the facts without a short additional opportunity to perform.
The financial damage can be much larger than the missing instalment. Many Israeli apartment contracts use agreed compensation around 10% of the full purchase price for a fundamental breach, so a NIS 300,000 financing gap on a NIS 5 million apartment can sit beside a contractual exposure of NIS 500,000.
The Sale Law bank guarantee does not solve the buyer’s own financing failure. It protects qualifying payments against specified developer-side failures; it is not cancellation insurance for a buyer who cannot produce the final balance.
Mortgage limits create another hard constraint. A buyer who still owes 80% of the purchase price at handover cannot automatically borrow that 80% if the regulated LTV ceiling is 75%, 70% or 50%, and extra borrowing can itself make the mortgage harder to approve by worsening the household’s debt burden.
The practical move is to reduce the problem to exact numbers before the deadline: the developer’s final statement, the mortgage amount actually cleared for disbursement, the cash gap, the contractual cure period and any written extension. If the gap is temporary, preserve the deal. If the money simply will not be available, negotiating an exit can become cheaper than forcing the purchase through with expensive debt.
Thinking of buying real estate in Israel?
Acquiring property in a different country is a complex task. Don't fall into common traps – grab our guide and make better decisions.
Why are Israeli apartment buyers getting caught by the final payment now?
Israeli apartment buyers are currently more exposed to a last-minute financing gap because developers spent the past few years pushing large parts of the purchase price toward handover.
The problem became big enough for the Bank of Israel to intervene. Developers had increasingly been selling apartments through 10/90, 15/85, 20/80 and similar structures, alongside subsidized bullet or balloon loans. A buyer could therefore sign with relatively little cash upfront and deal with most of the financing much later.
The Bank of Israel’s review of the 2025 banking system, released in 2026, shows how unusual the pattern became. Housing credit still grew 7.4% during 2025 even though housing transactions fell, especially purchases from developers. The Bank partly attributed that divergence to a growing delay between the date buyers signed purchase contracts and the date they actually took their mortgages. Developer financing incentives and longer construction periods had pushed those two moments further apart.
That delay is exactly where final-payment trouble appears. A buyer who signed two or three years ago may only now be discovering whether the bank will actually finance the amount left at handover.
The regulator’s temporary restrictions remain relevant today. Projects where a large share of sales defer a substantial amount until delivery face additional bank capital requirements, while developer-subsidized bullet and balloon mortgages are capped at 10% of monthly housing-loan originations. Those restrictions remain scheduled to run through the end of 2026.
| What changed | What buyers experienced | What the Bank of Israel saw | Why the final payment became risky |
|---|---|---|---|
| Large deferred-payment plans | Small initial cash requirement | More non-linear payment schedules | Affordability tested much later |
| Developer-subsidized balloon loans | Little or no principal repayment initially | Rapid growth in this financing structure | Loan eventually needs repayment or refinancing |
| Longer construction periods | More time between signing and handover | Wider gap between purchase and mortgage dates | Buyer circumstances can change meanwhile |
| Regulatory limits | Fewer unlimited financing promotions | Higher scrutiny of deferred-payment projects | Developers and banks are now less free to postpone the financing problem |
Does missing the final payment automatically cancel an Israel apartment purchase?
No. A missed final payment puts an Israeli apartment buyer in breach, but the purchase agreement does not normally vanish the moment the deadline passes.
Israel’s Contracts (Remedies for Breach of Contract) Law makes an important distinction between a fundamental breach and an ordinary breach. A fundamental breach can support cancellation without first giving the same opportunity to cure that is generally required for a non-fundamental breach.
The contract therefore matters enormously. Israeli apartment agreements commonly identify payment of the purchase price, especially the large payment due against possession, as one of the transaction’s central obligations. They may also specify how many days of delay are tolerated before the breach becomes serious enough to trigger stronger remedies.
So a buyer who pays NIS 900,000 six days late and a buyer who simply cannot produce NIS 900,000 are in very different positions even though both initially missed the same date.
We would never assume from the missed deadline alone that the apartment has already been lost. We would immediately check what the contract says happens next.
Don't buy the wrong property, in the wrong area of Israel
Buying real estate is a significant investment. Don't rely solely on your intuition. Gather the right information to make the best decision.
How late can I make the final Israel apartment payment before it gets serious?
There is no universal seven-day, fourteen-day or thirty-day grace period for the final payment on an Israeli apartment.
Some Israeli property contracts expressly tolerate a short payment delay. Current real-estate drafting guides commonly describe agreements allowing roughly 7–10 days before a payment delay becomes a fundamental breach, but that is a negotiated contract term rather than a rule every buyer receives automatically.
Other agreements are tougher. They may make timely payment of the balance a fundamental obligation from the outset or impose default interest almost immediately.
That difference can be worth hundreds of thousands of shekels. If our contract grants ten days, a mortgage arriving on day eight may save the transaction with relatively limited consequences. If the contract gives no such protection and the developer moves quickly, relying on an assumed grace period can be dangerous.
The only safe grace period is the one we can actually find in the signed agreement or obtain from the developer in writing.
Can an Israeli developer really cancel my apartment because I missed the last payment?
Yes. Failure to pay the remaining apartment price can become serious enough for the seller to cancel the deal.
Recent Supreme Court litigation makes the risk unusually concrete. In Jacobs v. Amar, the buyers failed to pay the remaining consideration within the time provided by their agreement. The Jerusalem District Court accepted the seller’s cancellation. On April 14, 2026, the Supreme Court treated the non-payment as a fundamental breach but reversed that outcome on the particular facts, holding that immediate cancellation was not permissible without giving the buyers a short additional opportunity to perform because of the seller’s conduct.
That case does not create an automatic rule that every late final payment ends in cancellation. It shows two things at once: failure to produce the balance can go to the heart of the deal, and even then the validity of a cancellation can still turn on the contract and the parties’ conduct.
Commercially, that is not surprising. At closing, the developer is preparing to give us possession and complete the transfer process while we are supposed to produce the remaining money. If we cannot do that at all, the missing payment affects the main exchange the contract was built around.
A final-payment problem becomes much more dangerous once it looks permanent rather than temporary.
Get to know the market before buying a property in Israel
Better information leads to better decisions. Get all the data you need before investing a large amount of money.
Does the Israeli developer have to warn me before cancelling the apartment contract?
Often there will be a demand or notice before an apartment deal is cancelled, but the amount of protection we get depends heavily on whether our breach is fundamental.
Under Israel’s Contracts Remedies Law, a non-fundamental breach normally requires the injured party to give the breaching party additional time to perform before cancelling. A fundamental breach gives the injured party much stronger cancellation rights.
Cancellation also requires notice. That is why a developer’s letter demanding the unpaid balance should be treated seriously, especially if it refers to a fundamental breach, a final cure date or termination of the purchase agreement.
Imagine that NIS 1.2 million is due and the developer gives us seven more days to pay. Those seven days may be the most important week in the entire transaction. A mortgage conversation that is still “moving through the bank” does not extend the developer’s deadline by itself.
Discussions with the bank buy us nothing under the purchase contract unless the developer also gives us more time.
Can the developer keep all the money I already paid for the Israel apartment?
Usually the developer cannot simply keep the apartment and every shekel we have already paid, but cancellation can still leave us with a very large loss.
Israeli contract law generally requires restitution after cancellation. If the transaction is unwound, each side normally has to return what it received, subject to the remedies and claims that arise from the breach.
Take a NIS 4 million apartment where we have already paid NIS 3.2 million. A valid cancellation does not normally turn that entire NIS 3.2 million into the developer’s windfall. The developer may, however, have claims for agreed compensation, interest, financing costs or other recoverable losses.
That is the awkward part: we may get a large amount back and still lose several hundred thousand shekels.
The amount already paid therefore tells us very little about the real downside until we have read the breach and compensation clauses.
Buying real estate in Israel can be risky
An increasing number of foreign investors are showing interest. However, 90% of them will make mistakes. Avoid the pitfalls with our comprehensive guide.
Could missing the final payment really cost me 10% of the Israel apartment price?
Yes. Around 10% of the full purchase price remains a very common agreed-compensation figure in Israeli apartment contracts, although Israeli law does not impose a universal 10% penalty.
Current Israeli real-estate practitioners still regularly describe clauses around 10% for a fundamental breach, with some agreements using different percentages. These clauses usually matter because agreed compensation can be claimed without having to prove the precise loss in the same way as an ordinary damages claim.
The uncomfortable part is the base used for the calculation. If the clause says 10% of the purchase price, a relatively small financing gap can create a much larger exposure.
Suppose we are NIS 300,000 short on a NIS 5 million apartment. A 10% agreed-compensation clause corresponds to NIS 500,000. The contractual exposure could therefore exceed the amount we originally struggled to finance.
Courts do have power under Israeli contract law to reduce agreed compensation where there was no reasonable relationship between the amount chosen and the loss that could have been anticipated when the contract was signed. That power should not be treated as an easy escape from a clause we already accepted.
| Apartment price | 5% clause | 10% clause | 15% clause |
|---|---|---|---|
| NIS 2.5m | NIS 125k | NIS 250k | NIS 375k |
| NIS 4m | NIS 200k | NIS 400k | NIS 600k |
| NIS 5m | NIS 250k | NIS 500k | NIS 750k |
| NIS 7m | NIS 350k | NIS 700k | NIS 1.05m |
Can the developer claim more than the 10% apartment penalty?
Potentially. A 10% agreed-compensation clause does not automatically settle every possible financial consequence of an Israeli apartment default.
The Contracts Remedies Law also deals with losses caused by the breach, while requiring the injured party to act reasonably to limit avoidable damage. What can ultimately be recovered depends on the agreement, the remedies claimed and the evidence.
The resale price can become particularly important. Suppose a developer cancels our NIS 4 million purchase and quickly sells the same apartment for NIS 4.3 million. Its argument that our breach caused a huge fall in the apartment’s value is obviously weaker than if the unit can only be resold for NIS 3.6 million after months of marketing and extra financing costs.
The developer may still have other contractual rights, including an agreed-compensation clause. We simply should not assume that “10%” is always either the guaranteed loss or the absolute ceiling.
Once cancellation is being discussed, we need to know the exact remedies the contract allows rather than relying on a standard percentage heard elsewhere.
Don't lose money on your property in Israel
100% of people who have lost money there have spent less than 1 hour researching the market. We have reviewed everything there is to know. Grab our guide now.
Does my Israeli Sale Law bank guarantee rescue me if I can’t make the final payment?
No. The Sale Law security protects money already paid against specified developer-side failures; it does not insure our ability to complete the purchase.
Israel’s Sale (Apartments) legislation generally prevents a developer from taking more than 7% of the apartment price without providing one of the approved forms of security. In financed projects, the familiar solution is a bank guarantee linked to payments made into the project’s supervised account.
Those protections became central to Israeli new-build sales because buyers can pay substantial amounts years before receiving the apartment.
But the statutory wording draws a crucial distinction. A guarantee can respond when the developer cannot transfer the apartment because of qualifying circumstances such as insolvency or another absolute legal impediment. Cancellation of the purchase agreement by itself does not count as that kind of absolute inability to deliver.
So if we default because we cannot produce the final NIS 800,000, we should not expect the Sale Law guarantee to work like cancellation insurance.
It protects us from losing protected payments because the developer collapses. Our own failure to pay raises a different set of contractual questions.
What if my mortgage approval disappears just before the final Israel apartment payment?
A mortgage falling through can still leave us in breach of the apartment contract because Israeli purchase agreements do not automatically give every buyer a financing escape clause.
This is one of the biggest misunderstandings around final payments. We may view the bank’s refusal as something that happened to us. The developer can still look at the signed contract and see an unpaid amount due on a fixed date.
An approval in principle also has a short shelf life. The Bank of Israel’s current mortgage guidance says that a standardized approval in principle is valid for 24 days, subject to conditions including the accuracy of the information provided by the borrower.
That is very different from having a mortgage irrevocably waiting for us two years after we signed the apartment purchase.
A buyer’s income can change. New debts can appear. The bank’s valuation can come in below expectations. Documentation can be incomplete. The amount required from the bank can also turn out to be larger than originally planned after we calculate the actual final balance.
Unless the purchase contract expressly makes the transaction conditional on obtaining financing, “the bank would not lend me enough” may explain the default without excusing it.
Get the full checklist for your due diligence in Israel
Don't repeat the same mistakes others have made before you. Make sure everything is in order before signing your sales contract.
How much mortgage can I actually use for the final Israel apartment payment?
The mortgage can rescue the final payment only up to the financing limits the bank is willing and legally allowed to give us.
The Bank of Israel currently caps ordinary loan-to-value ratios at 75% for the purchase of a sole dwelling, 70% for a replacement dwelling and 50% for an investment dwelling. The bank also uses the applicable property value under its valuation rules; our outstanding balance with the developer does not determine how much the bank can lend.
This gets awkward with heavily deferred payment plans.
Suppose we signed for a NIS 4 million apartment and paid NIS 800,000 during construction. We now owe NIS 3.2 million, equal to 80% of the purchase price. A buyer whose maximum regulated LTV is 75% cannot simply ask the bank to finance the whole remaining balance. Even before affordability checks, there is a NIS 200,000 gap.
For an investment buyer, the same transaction creates a much bigger problem. A 50% LTV cap corresponds to NIS 2 million on a NIS 4 million property, leaving another NIS 2 million to be funded elsewhere.
This is one reason deferred-payment deals can feel affordable at signing and become much harder at handover.
| Purchase type | Current maximum LTV | Maximum mortgage on NIS 4m | Minimum equity implied by LTV |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sole dwelling | 75% | NIS 3.0m | NIS 1.0m |
| Replacement dwelling | 70% | NIS 2.8m | NIS 1.2m |
| Investment dwelling | 50% | NIS 2.0m | NIS 2.0m |
Can I borrow the missing Israel apartment payment somewhere else?
Sometimes, but extra debt can solve the cash shortage while making the mortgage itself harder to obtain.
The Bank of Israel currently treats a mortgage payment-to-income ratio above 40% as high risk. Many mortgages are already written with repayments around the 30–40% range, so a buyer close to that limit does not have unlimited room to add another loan.
Suppose we need another NIS 350,000 to complete the apartment purchase. A personal loan, family loan or credit secured elsewhere may physically produce NIS 350,000. The mortgage bank can still care about the repayments and other liabilities we have taken on.
The arithmetic is not simply “mortgage plus another loan equals final payment.” Both pieces have to work at the same time.
If raising the missing equity makes our monthly debt burden unacceptable to the mortgage bank, the rescue financing defeats itself.
These days that deserves particular attention because the Bank of Israel is actively scrutinizing housing-credit structures rather than encouraging banks to stretch affordability indefinitely.
Don't sign a document you don't understand in Israel
Buying a property over there? We have reviewed all the documents you need to know. Stay out of trouble - grab our comprehensive guide.
Will an Israeli developer let me postpone the final apartment payment?
Quite possibly, especially when the financing problem is temporary, but the extension needs to be real and written down.
A developer may have little interest in blowing up a nearly completed transaction because our mortgage needs another two weeks. Cancellation can mean legal work, repayment calculations, a new buyer and more time before the developer receives the full price.
That gives us room to negotiate, particularly before we are formally in default.
The extension should answer the obvious questions: what is the new due date, what interest or indexation will apply, whether the developer waives the existing delay, whether the delay counts as a fundamental breach, and whether possession moves to a new date as well.
A salesperson saying “it should be fine” is nowhere near enough.
The timing also changes our leverage. A month before the deadline, we are asking to adjust the transaction. After receiving a formal cancellation notice, we may be asking the developer to revive a deal it says we already breached.
Can I still get the keys if I haven’t made the final Israel apartment payment?
Usually we should expect the developer to withhold possession until the final payment and other closing requirements have been satisfied.
Israeli developer agreements commonly connect the remaining purchase price with delivery of possession. At that point, both sides are expected to complete the main exchange: we pay what remains and the developer hands over the apartment together with the documents required at that stage.
An inspection appointment or a completed apartment does not necessarily change that.
This can make the financing problem more expensive than the original shortfall. If we expected to move out of a rental apartment after handover, a delay can leave us paying rent for longer while also facing default interest or other charges under the purchase agreement.
Someone who is NIS 500,000 short therefore needs to calculate more than the NIS 500,000. A delayed closing can create a second layer of costs every week the problem remains unresolved.
That is another reason to address the gap before handover rather than after the keys were supposed to arrive.
Get fresh and reliable information about the market in Israel
Don't base significant investment decisions on outdated data. Get updated and accurate information.
What should I do as soon as I know I’ll miss the final Israel apartment payment?
Once we know the final payment on an Israeli apartment may fail, we should work backward from the contractual deadline and get the exact financing gap down to one number.
First, we need the developer’s actual closing statement. The amount due may differ from the simple balance of the original purchase price because the contract can include permitted indexation, upgrades, credits, interest or other adjustments.
Then we need a mortgage amount the bank can really disburse. An old approval, an estimate from a mortgage broker or a bank employee saying the file “looks good” does not tell us how many shekels will arrive in the project account by the deadline.
The difference between those two numbers is the real problem.
If NIS 1.4 million is due and the bank will definitely release NIS 1.25 million, we have a NIS 150,000 problem. That can be attacked through available equity, permitted additional financing or a negotiated extension. Saying simply that “the mortgage is delayed” leaves everyone guessing about the size of the risk.
We would also have the payment-default provisions reviewed immediately. Once a formal demand arrives, the legal timetable can become just as important as the bank timetable.
| What we need to know | Weak answer | Useful answer | Why it changes the decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Final amount due | “Around NIS 1m” | Developer statement shows NIS 1.08m | Gives us the real target |
| Mortgage available | “Bank approved us” | NIS 880k cleared for disbursement subject to listed documents | Shows what is genuinely funded |
| Cash gap | “We’re a bit short” | NIS 200k | Tells us whether the problem is fixable |
| Contract deadline | “Around handover” | Exact payment date plus contractual grace period | Shows how much time remains |
| Developer flexibility | “Salesperson said it’s okay” | Signed extension to a new date | Changes our legal position |
| Default exposure | “Probably a penalty” | Exact agreed-compensation and cancellation clauses | Lets us compare rescue versus exit |
What if I already know I cannot complete the Israel apartment purchase?
If we genuinely cannot fund the final Israel apartment payment, we should compare the cost of exiting with the cost of forcing ourselves to complete a purchase we can no longer afford.
This is where throwing more debt at the problem can become expensive. A buyer may be tempted to borrow NIS 400,000 at almost any cost because losing a NIS 4 million apartment feels unbearable. But if the resulting mortgage and additional loans leave the household stretched for years, completing the purchase can be more damaging than negotiating an exit.
We would calculate three outcomes.
One is completion: how much extra cash is required, what that money costs and what the total monthly debt burden becomes.
Another is a negotiated release: how much of our money comes back, what agreed amount the developer wants to retain and whether both sides can close the matter without litigation.
The last is an unresolved default: potential agreed compensation, additional claimed losses, financing costs, legal expenses and uncertainty over when the money already paid will be returned.
A developer can sometimes prefer a clean negotiated exit, particularly if the apartment can be resold readily. We should never assume it will offer one, but it is a commercial outcome worth testing before the dispute hardens.
Get to know the market before buying a property in Israel
Better information leads to better decisions. Get all the data you need before investing a large amount of money.
So what actually happens if I can’t make my final Israel apartment payment?
If we cannot make the final payment on an Israeli apartment today, the purchase is genuinely at risk, but a financing shortfall discovered early can often still be managed before it turns into cancellation.
The current market makes this question more important than it used to be. Israeli developers pushed a large volume of buyers into transactions where much of the price came due years after signing. The Bank of Israel later found a widening gap between apartment purchases and the mortgages used to complete them, while housing credit kept growing 7.4% even as transaction volumes fell. Its restrictions on heavily deferred developer sales and subsidized bullet or balloon financing remain in force for now.
The legal position becomes harsher as the delay progresses. A missed date is a breach. A short delay may be curable under the contract or through a written extension. A serious failure to pay the remaining consideration can qualify as a fundamental breach and support cancellation, but the 2026 Jacobs v. Amar decision is also a reminder that even a fundamental breach does not make every attempted cancellation automatically valid.
The financial consequences can also be much larger than the unpaid instalment. A contract may carry agreed compensation around 10% of the entire purchase price, while cancellation can trigger restitution and additional disputes over losses, interest and expenses. The Sale Law bank guarantee generally does not rescue a buyer whose own inability to pay caused the deal to collapse.
Our conclusion is sharp: if the money will be available slightly late, the priority is to preserve the purchase before the contractual cure window closes. If the money simply will not be available, the priority changes quickly to negotiating the least expensive exit.
Waiting until the final-payment date is the dangerous middle ground. By then the bank may still be deciding whether to lend while the developer is already deciding whether to cancel.
OUR METHODOLOGY
This analysis tests what actually happens when an Israeli apartment buyer cannot make the final payment. We broke the question into the parts that can change the outcome: the payment schedule used when the apartment was sold, the buyer’s mortgage capacity at handover, the breach and cancellation rules in Israeli contract law, the remedies written into the purchase agreement, and the statutory protections that apply to money already paid.
For the current financing environment, we relied primarily on the Bank of Israel. Its 2025 banking-system review is the key source for the 7.4% growth in housing credit, the fall in housing transactions, and the widening delay between the date buyers signed apartment contracts and the date they actually took mortgages. We used the Bank’s 2025 temporary restrictions to confirm how deferred-payment sales and developer-subsidized bullet or balloon loans were being treated by the regulator.
For mortgage capacity, we treated the regulatory limits as hard constraints rather than assuming that a buyer can borrow whatever amount remains due to the developer. The Bank of Israel’s mortgage guidance and supervisory directives are the basis for the 75% / 70% / 50% LTV framework, the 24-day standardized approval-in-principle period, and the treatment of payment-to-income ratios above 40% as high risk.
For the legal analysis, we separated general statutory rules from terms that depend on the individual apartment contract. The Contracts (Remedies for Breach of Contract) Law is the core authority for fundamental breach, cancellation, notice, restitution, damages, mitigation and agreed compensation. Contractual conventions such as a 7–10 day cure period or compensation around 10% were not treated as universal rules of Israeli law.
We also used the 2026 Supreme Court decision in Jacobs v. Amar as a case-level test of how these rules can work in practice. The judgment is important because it supports both sides of the distinction used in the article: failure to pay the remaining apartment price can amount to a fundamental breach, but the validity of an immediate cancellation can still depend on the parties’ conduct and the specific circumstances.
For buyer protections, we relied on the Sale (Apartments) framework and the Ministry of Construction and Housing’s operative Sale Law material. That is the basis for distinguishing statutory protection of payments already made from the separate question of whether the buyer can finance the remaining balance.
We gave the most weight to conclusions supported from several directions at once. A financing gap was treated differently from a short timing delay; a contractual penalty was separated from additional claimed losses; and a commonly used contract clause was kept separate from a statutory rule. That is what lets us move from “the buyer missed a payment” to a more useful answer about what can actually happen next.
Key sources used for this analysis include: Bank of Israel on 2025 residential-loan trends, Bank of Israel on restrictions for deferred-payment and bullet/balloon financing structures, Bank of Israel Annual Report 2025, Bank of Israel mortgage guidance, Bank of Israel Directive 329 on housing-loan limits, the Contracts (Remedies for Breach of Contract) Law, the Sale (Apartments) Law, the Ministry of Construction and Housing’s operative Sale Law material, the Ministry’s guide for buyers purchasing from a developer, and the Supreme Court’s April 14, 2026 judgment in Civil Appeal 6275/23, Jack Raymond Jacobs v. Moshe Amar.
Buying real estate in Israel can be risky
An increasing number of foreign investors are showing interest. However, 90% of them will make mistakes. Avoid the pitfalls with our comprehensive guide.
Related blog posts
- What if the bank won’t fund the final 80% on my apartment?
- How much down payment does a foreign buyer need in Israel?
- Can I get a mortgage in Israel if I live abroad?
- Why are so many buyers cancelling new apartments in Israel?
